Moskos Prize Winners

2025

It is our pleasure to announce Matteo Mazziotti di Celso’s as the 2025 Moskos Prize winner with his article “The Impact of Military Policing on Armed Forces: The Case of Italy." Di Celso is a PhD candidate at the University of Genova and a Captain in the Italian Army.

Di Celso explores how military's partnership with police during internal security operations can influence the military profession. His study uses a theoretical framework based on Andrew Abbott's "system of profession" theory, which examines how changes in work dynamics impact a profession. This exploratory, case study of an Italian army joint operation with police analyzes government reports, results of parliamentary inquiry, official declarations, and semi-structured interviews with retired Italian Army officers. His study finds that the expansion of the Italian Army's role in internal security has resulted in the subordination of the military profession to the police. Soldiers were relegated to routine constabulary duties and work under strict supervision of police officers. The article contributes to civil-military relations theory by introducing a preliminary framework to study the effects of military role expansion on the military profession. The research provides insights that can be applied to other cases of military domestic operations, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamics and implications of such expansions.

Matteo Mazziotti di Celso is a PhD candidate in Security and Strategic Studies at the University of Genoa. His research focuses on civil-military relations, with a particular emphasis on the domestic use of armed forces in Europe. His dissertation examines the reasons that led Italian governments to deploy the armed forces for domestic policing purposes since the end of the Cold War. Matteo is also a Junior Associate Fellow at the NATO Defence College and a Research Fellow at the Centro Studi Geopolitica.info, where he coordinates the Italy/Europe desk and conducts research on defense and security issues. Before beginning his doctoral studies, he served for eight years in the Italian Army, first as a combat engineer platoon leader and later as a cadet platoon leader at the Italian Army Military Academy.

We extend our gratitude to this Moskos Prize selection committee: Dr. John Sibley Butler (University of Texas at Austin), Dr. Bernard Boene (L'Ecole Superieure Militaire de Saint-Cyr) and Patricia M. Shields (Texas State University).

2024

We are delighted to announce Dr. Alec Worsnop as the winner of the 2024 Moskos Prize for his article “The Rebel and the Politician: Developing a Typology of Insurgent Civil-Military Relations.”

Dr. Worsnop’s work extends Civil-Military Relations (CMR) as he explores the complex, fluid and asymmetric insurgent environment. He asks two basic questions. (1) In what ways do insurgent organizations structure and organize their civil-military relations? (2) How might these patterns influence insurgents' pursuit of political and military goals? In this exploratory, theory building exercise he uses the literature to build an innovative typology that combines and intensive form of civilian control, political integration and the degree of military professionalization. Using this framework and analysis of insurgent groups from Vietnam, Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan he found that political integration, a rarely studied form of civilian control in which political decision makers are involved in the details of insurgent military decision making is common in most successful insurgent groups. He concludes by showing how the typology can be used as a springboard for future research on insurgent and state-based CMR in unstable environments. The committee found his work original, ground-breaking, comparative and relevant for theory building.

Alec Worsnop is an Assistant Professor in the School of Public Policy at the University of Maryland, College Park. He directs the Military Perspectives Speaker Series and is a Research Fellow in the Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland (CISSM). His research looks into sub-state conflict, with a particular focus on the internal dynamics of non-state armed actors. Other work focuses on military effectiveness and civil-military relations. His book, Rebels in the Field: Cadre and the Development of Insurgent Military Power, forthcoming from Oxford University Press, investigates the battlefield performance of insurgent organizations. His research has appeared in Security Studies, Armed Forces and Society, and Political Science Research and Methods and has been supported by organizations the Department of Homeland Security's National Counterterrorism Innovation, Technology, and Education Center (NCITE), the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the Harvard Kennedy School, the Institute for Security and Conflict Studies at George Washington University, the Modern War Institute at West Point, the Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, and the Smith Richardson Foundation. He holds a Ph.D. in Political Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he was an affiliate of the Security Studies Program. Previously, he worked for a USAID implementing partner conducting business development for assistance programs in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

Many thanks for the dedicated work of the selection committee composed of Dr. John Sibley Butler (University of Texas at Austin), Dr. Bernard Boene (L'Ecole Superieure Militaire de Saint-Cyr) and Patricia M. Shields (Texas State University).

2023

We are pleased to announce Dr. Edward Gonzalez as the winner of the 2023 Moskos Award for his article "Adjudicating Competing Theories: Does Civilian Control over the Military Decrease Conflict?"

This article addresses a central question for the political sociology of the military: are states in which civilian leadership has more control over the military less likely to initiate wars than states where the military has greater say over foreign policy? This article has an impressive agenda. Edward Gonzalez seeks to adjudicate between two competing theories about the impact of civilian control on the propensity to use force, “civilian conservatism” (civilian control leads to less war) and “military conservatism” (civilian control leads to more war). In addition, he uses his larger data sets for hypothesis testing. He employs a sophisticated approach, using Poisson regression models and the established, widely regarded MID4 dataset on international conflict. His results run against the grain of current thinking on the consequences of civilian control for the propensity of states to use force at a time of decreasing regional stability. Gonzalez performs diligent robustness checks on his coefficients and provides prudent caveats to quantitative conclusions on the data, some of which may be addressed through broader social science research, including detailed case studies and normative analysis. Our author makes sense of his counterintuitive findings and shows the continuing relevance of “military conservatism” theory on the use of force, a theory that, perhaps too soon, has faded from scholarly interest. In this remarkable article, Edward Gonzalez advances the state of our knowledge on the relationship between civilian control, military involvement in national security decision making, and the causes of war.

Dr. Edward Gonzalez earned his PhD in Political Science and International Relations from the University of Southern California in 2023, with a focus on International Security. His dissertation examines the puzzle of nuclear reversals: why some states that were pursuing nuclear bombs decided to reverse course and terminate their nuclear ambitions. His dissertation advances a novel two-pathway theory of nuclear reversals, examining how the use/threat of force and international norms, respectively, influence states to terminate nuclear weapons pursuit. In addition to studying nuclear politics, Dr. Gonzalez is interested in international conflict and war. Currently, he is collaborating in a book project and research articles with the Near Crisis Project, a multi-university collaborative project studying near crisis events, particularly exploring why some disputes escalate into international crises while others do not. Dr. Gonzalez will be working as a visiting lecturer for the Master of Arts in International Relations (MAIR) program at New York University for the 2023-2024 academic year. Prior to USC, he earned a Master of Arts in Political Science from California State University, Long Beach in 2015 and a BA in Political Science from California State University, Dominguez Hills in 2012.

The task of finding the winner fell to the selection committee, composed of Professor Damon Coletta (United States Air Force Academy), Professor Yagil Levy (The Open University of Israel), and Professor Pascal Vennesson (S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University Singapore) (Chair). We appreciate their hard work and dedication.

2022

We are happy to announce Dr. Matthew Cancian as the 2022 winner of the Charles Moskos Prize for his article “The Motivation to Enlist Among Kurds.”

Dr. Cancian’s article, addresses theoretically and empirically a central question in military sociology: why individuals join armed forces. The author seeks to assess the degree to which Charles Moskos’s classical analytical framework on motivation to enlist “travels” to other contexts, here Kurdish fighters engaged in the fight against ISIS, thereby encouraging comparative perspectives in military sociology. He provides a nuanced answer: Moskos’s model is useful but incomplete. To better take into account the specific context of the recruitment of Kurdish fighters, he combines a new category – the desire for revenge – to the classic occupational and institutional motivations to join. The award committee found particularly stimulating and fruitful the paper’s effort to explore a classical theme such as enlistment in the non-state context of a war-fighting militia. This helps to explain motivations to join under unique conditions, very different from typical Western militaries. Moreover, Kurdish recruitment is of high interest to Western armed forces seeking allies in the fight against ISIS and beyond. Lastly, the paper is grounded in a fascinating empirical enquiry under difficult, ongoing war condition. It is the result of a fruitful cooperation with local researchers as well as local Kurdish commanders. In sum, the paper makes an important contribution to the study of nonstate warfare from a sociological perspective.

Dr. Cancian studies military operations at the Naval War College as a contractor for Saalex Solutions. He received his PhD in Political Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2022, where he concentrated in Security Studies and Comparative Politics. His thesis was about the motivations of combatants and the effects of training, based on a survey of 2,301 Kurdish fighters (Peshmerga) during their war against the Islamic State. He is interested in adding new, data-driven perspectives to all questions pertaining to security studies. Before MIT he earned a Masters in Law and Diplomacy from the Fletcher School and a BA in History from the University of Virginia. Between those educational experiences he served as a Captain in the United States Marine Corps, deploying to Sangin, Afghanistan as a Forward Observer in 2011 in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.

We want to thank the selection committee, composed of Professor Damon Coletta (United States Air Force Academy), Professor Yagil Levy (The Open University of Israel), and Professor Pascal Vennesson (S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University Singapore) (Chair).

 

2021

We are happy to announce Dr. Demet Yalcin Mousseau as the inaugural winner of the Charles Moskos Prize for her article "Does Foreign Development Aid Trigger Ethnic War in Developing States?". The selection committee, composed of Professor Damon Coletta (United States Air Force Academy), Professor Yagil Levy (The Open University of Israel), and Professor Pascal Vennesson (S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University Singapore) (Chair), were unanimous in their decision.

This innovative article addresses a significant and enduring issue: in a post-pandemic world, neither foreign development aid, nor ethnic conflict are going away. The paper creatively addresses a scholarly gap: the impact of developmental aid on ethnic war, not merely on civil wars in general and other manifestations of state instability previously covered by the literature.

Dr. Mousseau combines several methods in a sophisticated way. She conducted a case study to comprehend to what extent and how foreign aid reshapes domestic politics in developing states, and conducted a large quantitative study as well. The piece features a creative and rigorous treatment of existing data to parse previous murky results on civil war and clarify the relationship between development aid and ethnic violence

Moreover, the author bravely challenges the conventional wisdom. Foreign aid is, and should be, inherently designed to improve domestic stability and, ultimately, favor development. However, it may have the unintended consequence of destabilizing inter-ethnic relations in some countries and thus may become a dangerous cause of war. This insightful, counterintuitive conclusion has immediate policy implications and should help design better foreign development aid.

Dr. Demet Mousseau is an Assistant Professor at University of Central Florida, School of Politics, Security, and International Affairs.